lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNATVHbMHqjboACJF8BbKianRfjiGhHTXjtQuJVmv2HFPUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 16 Nov 2019 16:17:49 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Recent slowdown in single object builds

On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 8:10 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed that current -git is a lot slower at doing single object
> builds than earlier kernels. Here's an example, building the exact same
> file on 5.2 and -git:
>
> $ time make fs/io_uring.o
> real    0m5.953s
> user    0m5.402s
> sys     0m0.649s
>
> vs 5.2 based (with all the backports, identical file):
>
> $ time make fs/io_uring.o
> real    0m3.218s
> user    0m2.968s
> sys     0m0.520s
>
> Any idea what's going on here? It's almost twice as slow, which is
> problematic...



This is necessary cost
to do single builds
(394053f4a4b3e3eeeaa67b67fc886a9a75bd9e4d)
but, it is much better in linux-next.



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ