[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191117221310.917990004@goodmis.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 17:13:02 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 6/7] ftrace: Add another check for match in register_ftrace_direct()
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
As an instruction pointer passed into register_ftrace_direct() may just
exist on the ftrace call site, but may not be the start of the call site
itself, register_ftrace_direct() still needs to update test if a direct call
exists on the normalized site, as only one direct call is allowed at any one
time.
Fixes: 763e34e74bb7d ("ftrace: Add register_ftrace_direct()")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 32e4e5ffdd97..9fe33ebaf914 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -5030,7 +5030,12 @@ int register_ftrace_direct(unsigned long ip, unsigned long addr)
goto out_unlock;
/* Make sure the ip points to the exact record */
- ip = rec->ip;
+ if (ip != rec->ip) {
+ ip = rec->ip;
+ /* Need to check this ip for a direct. */
+ if (find_rec_direct(ip))
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
ret = -ENOMEM;
if (ftrace_hash_empty(direct_functions) ||
--
2.24.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists