lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191117110214.6b160b2e@why>
Date:   Sun, 17 Nov 2019 11:02:14 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc:     linux-realtek-soc@...ts.infradead.org,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] ARM: realtek: Enable RTD1195 arch timer

On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 08:21:09 +0100
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de> wrote:

> Without this magic write the timer doesn't work and boot gets stuck.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
> ---
>  What is the name of the register 0xff018000?
>  Is 0x1 a BIT(0) write, or how are the register bits defined?
>  Is this a reset or a clock gate? How should we model it in DT?
>  
>  v2 -> v3: Unchanged
>  
>  v2: New
>  
>  arch/arm/mach-realtek/rtd1195.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-realtek/rtd1195.c b/arch/arm/mach-realtek/rtd1195.c
> index b31a4066be87..0532379c74f5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-realtek/rtd1195.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-realtek/rtd1195.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
>   * Copyright (c) 2017-2019 Andreas Färber
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/clocksource.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/memblock.h>
>  #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
>  
> @@ -24,6 +27,18 @@ static void __init rtd1195_reserve(void)
>  	rtd1195_memblock_remove(0x18100000, 0x01000000);
>  }
>  
> +static void __init rtd1195_init_time(void)
> +{
> +	void __iomem *base;
> +
> +	base = ioremap(0xff018000, 4);
> +	writel(0x1, base);
> +	iounmap(base);
> +
> +	of_clk_init(NULL);
> +	timer_probe();
> +}

Gawd... Why isn't this set from the bootloader? By the time the kernel
starts, everything should be up and running. What is it going to do
when you kexec? Shouldn't this be a read/modify/write sequence?

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ