lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 13:16:19 +0100 From: Stephan Müller <smueller@...onox.de> To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, "Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@...il.com>, "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, Vito Caputo <vcaputo@...garu.com>, Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ray Strode <rstrode@...hat.com>, William Jon McCann <mccann@....edu>, zhangjs <zachary@...shancloud.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>, Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>, Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>, "Peter, Matthias" <matthias.peter@....bund.de>, Marcelo Henrique Cerri <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com>, Roman Drahtmueller <draht@...altsekun.de>, Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v25 03/12] LRNG - /proc interface Am Samstag, 16. November 2019, 17:39:40 CET schrieb Andy Lutomirski: Hi Andy, > > On Nov 16, 2019, at 1:40 AM, Stephan Müller <smueller@...onox.de> wrote: > > > > The LRNG /proc interface provides the same files as the legacy > > /dev/random. These files behave identically. Yet, all files are > > documented at [1]. > > Why? I am not sure here: are you referring to the documentation? Or the one additional file? If it is the documentation, do you want me to add it to the patch description? I initially did not add it as these files were present and seemingly known what they provide. But I would add that documentation to the patch description if this is desired. If it is the additional file, should I move it to another place like a sysfs interface? Thank you. Ciao Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists