linux-kernel - Re: Recent slowdown in single object builds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:40:16 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Recent slowdown in single object builds

On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 1:57 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>
> On 11/16/19 12:17 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 8:10 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've noticed that current -git is a lot slower at doing single object
> >> builds than earlier kernels. Here's an example, building the exact same
> >> file on 5.2 and -git:
> >>
> >> $ time make fs/io_uring.o
> >> real    0m5.953s
> >> user    0m5.402s
> >> sys     0m0.649s
> >>
> >> vs 5.2 based (with all the backports, identical file):
> >>
> >> $ time make fs/io_uring.o
> >> real    0m3.218s
> >> user    0m2.968s
> >> sys     0m0.520s
> >>
> >> Any idea what's going on here? It's almost twice as slow, which is
> >> problematic...


BTW, I am using a cheap machine based on Intel Core i7-6700K.
I can build fs/io_uring.o (based on x86_64_defconfig) much faster.


The slowdown (1.990 sec -> 2.861 sec) is not terrible for me.



masahiro@pug:~/ref/linux$ git describe
v5.2
masahiro@pug:~/ref/linux$ touch  fs/io_uring.c; time  make  fs/io_uring.o
  CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
  CALL    scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
  DESCEND  objtool
  CC      fs/io_uring.o

real 0m1.990s
user 0m1.723s
sys 0m0.427s




masahiro@pug:~/ref/linux-next$ git describe
next-20191115
masahiro@pug:~/ref/linux-next$ touch   fs/io_uring.c; time  make  fs/io_uring.o
  CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
  CALL    scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
  DESCEND  objtool
  CC      fs/io_uring.o

real 0m2.861s
user 0m2.373s
sys 0m0.642s





Snippet from my /proc/cpuinfo

processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 94
model name      : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700K CPU @ 4.00GHz
stepping        : 3
microcode       : 0xd4
cpu MHz         : 800.023
cache size      : 8192 KB



> >
> >
> > This is necessary cost
> > to do single builds
> > (394053f4a4b3e3eeeaa67b67fc886a9a75bd9e4d)
> > but, it is much better in linux-next.
>
> Very sad that it's now twice as slow as before, that's a real problem.
> This isn't a marginal slowdown.
>
> I've never had issues with single object builds before, and in fact
> it's often useful to build stuff that's disabled as a single object.
> Where's the report that led to this commit being necessary?
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada