linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the kbuild tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Nov 2019 14:38:42 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Christoffer Dall <cdall@...columbia.edu>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the kbuild tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in:

  include/Kbuild

between commit:

  fcbb8461fd23 ("kbuild: remove header compile test")

from the kbuild tree and commit:

  55009c6ed2d2 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Factor out hypercall handling from PSCI code")

from the kvm-arm tree.

I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped