linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] net: Fix comment block per style guide

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1911182154160.3116@hadrien>
Date:   Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:55:02 +0100 (CET)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:     Travis Davies <tdavies@...kphysics.net>
cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] net: Fix comment block per style guide



On Mon, 18 Nov 2019, Travis Davies wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Travis Davies <tdavies@...kphysics.net>
>
> ---
>
> This patch places /* and */ on separate lines for a
> multiline block comment, in order to keep code style
> consistant with majority of blocks throughout the file.
>
> This will prevent a checkpatch.pl warning:
> 'Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line'

The comments and the signed off by both go above the ---.  Comments first.
Look at lkml to see what others do.

julia

>
>  include/linux/netdevice.h | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index c20f190b4c18..a2605e043fa2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -95,9 +95,11 @@ void netdev_set_default_ethtool_ops(struct net_device *dev,
>  #define NET_XMIT_CN		0x02	/* congestion notification	*/
>  #define NET_XMIT_MASK		0x0f	/* qdisc flags in net/sch_generic.h */
>
> -/* NET_XMIT_CN is special. It does not guarantee that this packet is lost. It
> +/*
> + * NET_XMIT_CN is special. It does not guarantee that this packet is lost. It
>   * indicates that the device will soon be dropping packets, or already drops
> - * some packets of the same priority; prompting us to send less aggressively. */
> + * some packets of the same priority; prompting us to send less aggressively.
> + */
>  #define net_xmit_eval(e)	((e) == NET_XMIT_CN ? 0 : (e))
>  #define net_xmit_errno(e)	((e) != NET_XMIT_CN ? -ENOBUFS : 0)
>
> --
> 2.21.0
>
>