linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net 2/2] act_ct: support asymmetric conntrack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Nov 2019 16:24:18 -0500
From:   Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
To:     Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>,
        "netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        "dev\@openvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] act_ct: support asymmetric conntrack

Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com> writes:

> On 11/14/2019 4:22 PM, Roi Dayan wrote:
>>
>> On 2019-11-08 11:07 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>>> The act_ct TC module shares a common conntrack and NAT infrastructure
>>> exposed via netfilter.  It's possible that a packet needs both SNAT and
>>> DNAT manipulation, due to e.g. tuple collision.  Netfilter can support
>>> this because it runs through the NAT table twice - once on ingress and
>>> again after egress.  The act_ct action doesn't have such capability.
>>>
>>> Like netfilter hook infrastructure, we should run through NAT twice to
>>> keep the symmetry.
>>>
>>> Fixes: b57dc7c13ea9 ("net/sched: Introduce action ct")
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>>   net/sched/act_ct.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
>>> index fcc46025e790..f3232a00970f 100644
>>> --- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
>>> +++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
>>> @@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ static int tcf_ct_act_nat(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>   			  bool commit)
>>>   {
>>>   #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT)
>>> +	int err;
>>>   	enum nf_nat_manip_type maniptype;
>>>   
>>>   	if (!(ct_action & TCA_CT_ACT_NAT))
>>> @@ -359,7 +360,17 @@ static int tcf_ct_act_nat(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>   		return NF_ACCEPT;
>>>   	}
>>>   
>>> -	return ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, range, maniptype);
>>> +	err = ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, range, maniptype);
>>> +	if (err == NF_ACCEPT &&
>>> +	    ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT && ct->status & IPS_DST_NAT) {
>>> +		if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)
>>> +			maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;
>>> +		else
>>> +			maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;
>>> +
>>> +		err = ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, range, maniptype);
>>> +	}
>>> +	return err;
>>>   #else
>>>   	return NF_ACCEPT;
>>>   #endif
>>>
>> +paul
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> I think I understand the issue and this looks good,
>
> Can you describe the scenario to reproduce this?

It reproduces with OpenShift 3.10, which makes forward direction packets
between namespaces pump through a tun device that applies NAT rules to
rewrite the dest.  Limit the namespace number of ephemeral sockets using
by editing net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range in the client namespace, and
connect to the server namespace.  That's the mechanism for OvS.  But for
TC I guess there wouldn't be anything convenient avaiable.

I'll try to script up something that doesn't use openshift.

>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul.