[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191118215759.GD35479@atomide.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 13:57:59 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>
Cc: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Use ARM SMC Calling Convention when OP-TEE is
available
Hi,
* Andrew F. Davis <afd@...com> [191118 08:53]:
> +#define OMAP_SIP_SMC_STD_CALL_VAL(func_num) \
> + ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_STD_CALL, ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SIP, (func_num))
> +
> +void omap_smc1(u32 fn, u32 arg)
> +{
> + struct device_node *optee;
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + /*
> + * If this platform has OP-TEE installed we use ARM SMC calls
> + * otherwise fall back to the OMAP ROM style calls.
> + */
> + optee = of_find_node_by_path("/firmware/optee");
> + if (optee) {
> + arm_smccc_smc(OMAP_SIP_SMC_STD_CALL_VAL(fn), arg,
> + 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> + WARN(res.a0, "Secure function call 0x%08x failed\n", fn);
> + } else {
> + _omap_smc1(fn, arg);
> + }
> +}
I think we're better off just making arm_smccc_smc() work properly.
See cat arch/arm*/kernel/smccc-call.S.
If quirk handling is needed, looks like ARM_SMCCC_QUIRK_STATE_OFFS
can be used.
AFAIK this should work both for optee and the current use cases.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists