[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0h9xQeebYst8mg6YOzSXoY=JDg0F8wDXw1QPEatiC-=UA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 09:43:04 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@...wei.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Dexuan-Linux Cui <dexuan.linux@...il.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"hushiyuan@...wei.com" <hushiyuan@...wei.com>,
"linfeilong@...wei.com" <linfeilong@...wei.com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: sysfs: Change ACPI_MASKABLE_GPE_MAX to 0x100
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 3:22 AM Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2019/11/19 5:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 8:44 PM Dexuan-Linux Cui <dexuan.linux@...il.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 1:04 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 9:06 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:17 PM Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@...wei.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The commit 0f27cff8597d ("ACPI: sysfs: Make ACPI GPE mask kernel
> >>>>> parameter cover all GPEs") says:
> >>>>> "Use a bitmap of size 0xFF instead of a u64 for the GPE mask so 256
> >>>>> GPEs can be masked"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But the masking of GPE 0xFF it not supported and the check condition
> >>>>> "gpe > ACPI_MASKABLE_GPE_MAX" is not valid because the type of gpe is
> >>>>> u8.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So modify the macro ACPI_MASKABLE_GPE_MAX to 0x100, and drop the "gpe >
> >>>>> ACPI_MASKABLE_GPE_MAX" check. In addition, update the docs "Format" for
> >>>>> acpi_mask_gpe parameter.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fixes: 0f27cff8597d ("ACPI: sysfs: Make ACPI GPE mask kernel parameter cover all GPEs")
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@...wei.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> v1 -> v2:
> >>>>> - drop the "gpe > ACPI_MASKABLE_GPE_MAX" check
> >>>>> - update the docs "Format" from <int> to <byte> for acpi_mask_gpe parameter
> >>>>> - update the commit comment
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 +-
> >>>>> drivers/acpi/sysfs.c | 4 ++--
> >>>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Bisect flags commit eb09878e1301 "ACPI: sysfs: Change
> >>>> ACPI_MASKABLE_GPE_MAX to 0x100" in -next as the reason for a boot
> >>>> regression in my qemu-kvm test environment. It spews:
> >>>>
> >>>> [ 1.456728] ACPI: Masking GPE 0x0.
> >>>> ...
> >>>> [ 161.721420] ACPI: Masking GPE 0x0.
> >>>>
> >>>> ...and then hangs.
> >>>>
> >>>> A straight revert gets the configuration back on its feet.
> >>>>
> >>>> qemu-system-x86_64 --version
> >>>> QEMU emulator version 4.0.50 (v4.0.0-928-g49c6c6ac0cd8)
> >>>
> >>> OK, I'll drop it then, thanks!
> >>
> >> We're seeing the same issue wtih 5.4.0-rc7-next-20191118 on a Linux VM
> >> running on Hyper-V :
> >>
> >> [ 0.133029] ACPI: 1 ACPI AML tables successfully acquired and loaded
> >> [ 0.144023] ACPI: Interpreter enabled
> >> [ 0.145023] ACPI: (supports S0 S5)
> >> [ 0.146023] ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
> >> [ 0.147024] PCI: Using host bridge windows from ACPI; if necessary,
> >> use "pci=nocrs" and report a bug
> >> [ 0.148031] ACPI: Masking GPE 0x0.
> >> ...
> >> [ 774.839023] ACPI: Masking GPE 0x0.
> >> [ 774.840023] ACPI: Masking GPE 0x0.
> >>
> >> I guess the patch is only tested on a physical machine and not on a VM...
> >
> > It looks like the patch hasn't been tested at all.
> >
> > Please try to change the data type of gpe in
> > acpi_gpe_apply_masked_gpes() to u16 and see if that helps.
> >
> Sorry for this problem, I have no good test after modification according to
> inspection opinions.
I see.
Well, reviewers make mistakes too ...
> The first version patch is ok, the type of gpe is changed to u32. and I have
> test it before.
OK
So I have added the u8 -> u16 change for gpe in
acpi_gpe_apply_masked_gpes() and applied it again, as that should work
AFAICS.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists