[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191119100022.xjvwxwepa4xqcr7q@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 11:00:22 +0100
From: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a
regular spinlock_t
On 2019-11-19 10:30:01 [+0100], Jan Kara wrote:
> OK, how do we push this? Do you plan to push this through tip tree?
Is it reasonable to push this via the ext4 tree?
> Honza
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists