linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: i2c: Fix return value of i2c_smbus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c8aeb189-16da-0585-db6e-ec61a87eafba@axentia.se>
Date:   Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:24:00 +0000
From:   Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To:     Lei YU <mine260309@...il.com>
CC:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: i2c: Fix return value of i2c_smbus_xxx functions

On 2019-11-19 10:43, Lei YU wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 5:33 PM Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se> wrote:
>> And the line is now too long compared to the rest of the text, so you
>> need to rewrap the paragraph.
> 
> In this patch it's at column 78, that should be OK.

No, that's not ok. If the rest
of the paragraph is wrapped at 72 (or something such), a single line
breaking that pattern will be
disturbing to the reader. The
fact that you don't get some
checkpatch warning has nothing
to do with that.

Cheers,
Peter