[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5323691.yyFvDVlHDV@tauon.chronox.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 11:55:23 +0100
From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@...il.com>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Vito Caputo <vcaputo@...garu.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ray Strode <rstrode@...hat.com>,
William Jon McCann <mccann@....edu>,
zhangjs <zachary@...shancloud.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>,
Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
"Peter, Matthias" <matthias.peter@....bund.de>,
Marcelo Henrique Cerri <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com>,
Roman Drahtmueller <draht@...altsekun.de>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v25 03/12] LRNG - /proc interface
Am Dienstag, 19. November 2019, 11:06:02 CET schrieb Andy Lutomirski:
Hi Andy,
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 4:16 AM Stephan Müller <smueller@...onox.de> wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 16. November 2019, 17:39:40 CET schrieb Andy Lutomirski:
> >
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > > > On Nov 16, 2019, at 1:40 AM, Stephan Müller <smueller@...onox.de>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The LRNG /proc interface provides the same files as the legacy
> > > > /dev/random. These files behave identically. Yet, all files are
> > > > documented at [1].
> > >
> > > Why?
> >
> > I am not sure here: are you referring to the documentation? Or the one
> > additional file?
> >
> > If it is the documentation, do you want me to add it to the patch
> > description? I initially did not add it as these files were present and
> > seemingly known what they provide. But I would add that documentation to
> > the patch description if this is desired.
>
> Sorry, I should have been a lot more explicit. Why do you want to add
> a new interface to read the RNG? What's wrong with the old one?
There is nothing wrong at all. I actually want to be 100% API and ABI
compliant with the existing random.c. Thus, the list of the sysctls are
identical to the existing random.c with the same behavior (hence I skipped the
documentation of these files).
Yet, the wiring up of the interfaces to internal data structures and handlers
is different than for the existing random.c.
Also, the reason why I created a separate lrng_proc.c (and lrng_interface.c)
is to allow a possible merger of this similar code with the existing random.c.
The only question that needs to be solved is to find a common way to invoke
the random.c internal logic and the LRNG internal logic with these interfaces.
>
> I think your patch description should explain the purpose of the patch.
Ok, I can surely add a description for each file to the patch description.
Ciao
Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists