| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:01:01 +0100
From: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Radu Pirea <radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro>
Cc: "stable # 4 . 4+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 150/422] tty/serial: atmel: Change the driver to work
under at91-usart MFD
Hi all,
Le 19/11/2019 à 06:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman a écrit :
> From: Radu Pirea <radu.pirea@...rochip.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit c24d25317a7c6bb3053d4c193b3cf57d1e9a3e4b ]
>
> This patch modifies the place where resources and device tree properties
> are searched.
Maybe I missed something, but I don't see why this is backported to stable.
I don't think that this patch was send with a Cc: stable (I just came
back from holidays, so I may be wrong :))
Moreover, it's part of a series that introduce "config MFD_AT91_USART",
but grepping MFD_AT91_USART on stable-rc/linux-4.19.y only returns:
drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig: select MFD_AT91_USART
So I think this is a mistake (but how it got there ? it is by a bot or
something ?)
regards,
Richard
>
> Signed-off-by: Radu Pirea <radu.pirea@...rochip.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig b/drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig
> index df8bd0c7b97db..32886c3046413 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig
> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ config SERIAL_ATMEL
> depends on ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST
> select SERIAL_CORE
> select SERIAL_MCTRL_GPIO if GPIOLIB
> + select MFD_AT91_USART
> help
> This enables the driver for the on-chip UARTs of the Atmel
> AT91 processors.
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> index dd8949e8fcd7a..251f708f47f76 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> @@ -195,8 +195,7 @@ static struct console atmel_console;
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> static const struct of_device_id atmel_serial_dt_ids[] = {
> - { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-usart" },
> - { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-usart" },
> + { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-usart-serial" },
> { /* sentinel */ }
> };
> #endif
> @@ -926,6 +925,7 @@ static void atmel_tx_dma(struct uart_port *port)
> static int atmel_prepare_tx_dma(struct uart_port *port)
> {
> struct atmel_uart_port *atmel_port = to_atmel_uart_port(port);
> + struct device *mfd_dev = port->dev->parent;
> dma_cap_mask_t mask;
> struct dma_slave_config config;
> int ret, nent;
> @@ -933,7 +933,7 @@ static int atmel_prepare_tx_dma(struct uart_port *port)
> dma_cap_zero(mask);
> dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask);
>
> - atmel_port->chan_tx = dma_request_slave_channel(port->dev, "tx");
> + atmel_port->chan_tx = dma_request_slave_channel(mfd_dev, "tx");
> if (atmel_port->chan_tx == NULL)
> goto chan_err;
> dev_info(port->dev, "using %s for tx DMA transfers\n",
> @@ -1104,6 +1104,7 @@ static void atmel_rx_from_dma(struct uart_port *port)
> static int atmel_prepare_rx_dma(struct uart_port *port)
> {
> struct atmel_uart_port *atmel_port = to_atmel_uart_port(port);
> + struct device *mfd_dev = port->dev->parent;
> struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc;
> dma_cap_mask_t mask;
> struct dma_slave_config config;
> @@ -1115,7 +1116,7 @@ static int atmel_prepare_rx_dma(struct uart_port *port)
> dma_cap_zero(mask);
> dma_cap_set(DMA_CYCLIC, mask);
>
> - atmel_port->chan_rx = dma_request_slave_channel(port->dev, "rx");
> + atmel_port->chan_rx = dma_request_slave_channel(mfd_dev, "rx");
> if (atmel_port->chan_rx == NULL)
> goto chan_err;
> dev_info(port->dev, "using %s for rx DMA transfers\n",
> @@ -2246,8 +2247,8 @@ static const char *atmel_type(struct uart_port *port)
> */
> static void atmel_release_port(struct uart_port *port)
> {
> - struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(port->dev);
> - int size = pdev->resource[0].end - pdev->resource[0].start + 1;
> + struct platform_device *mpdev = to_platform_device(port->dev->parent);
> + int size = resource_size(mpdev->resource);
>
> release_mem_region(port->mapbase, size);
>
> @@ -2262,8 +2263,8 @@ static void atmel_release_port(struct uart_port *port)
> */
> static int atmel_request_port(struct uart_port *port)
> {
> - struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(port->dev);
> - int size = pdev->resource[0].end - pdev->resource[0].start + 1;
> + struct platform_device *mpdev = to_platform_device(port->dev->parent);
> + int size = resource_size(mpdev->resource);
>
> if (!request_mem_region(port->mapbase, size, "atmel_serial"))
> return -EBUSY;
> @@ -2365,27 +2366,28 @@ static int atmel_init_port(struct atmel_uart_port *atmel_port,
> {
> int ret;
> struct uart_port *port = &atmel_port->uart;
> + struct platform_device *mpdev = to_platform_device(pdev->dev.parent);
>
> atmel_init_property(atmel_port, pdev);
> atmel_set_ops(port);
>
> - uart_get_rs485_mode(&pdev->dev, &port->rs485);
> + uart_get_rs485_mode(&mpdev->dev, &port->rs485);
>
> port->iotype = UPIO_MEM;
> port->flags = UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF | UPF_IOREMAP;
> port->ops = &atmel_pops;
> port->fifosize = 1;
> port->dev = &pdev->dev;
> - port->mapbase = pdev->resource[0].start;
> - port->irq = pdev->resource[1].start;
> + port->mapbase = mpdev->resource[0].start;
> + port->irq = mpdev->resource[1].start;
> port->rs485_config = atmel_config_rs485;
> - port->membase = NULL;
> + port->membase = NULL;
>
> memset(&atmel_port->rx_ring, 0, sizeof(atmel_port->rx_ring));
>
> /* for console, the clock could already be configured */
> if (!atmel_port->clk) {
> - atmel_port->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "usart");
> + atmel_port->clk = clk_get(&mpdev->dev, "usart");
> if (IS_ERR(atmel_port->clk)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(atmel_port->clk);
> atmel_port->clk = NULL;
> @@ -2718,13 +2720,22 @@ static void atmel_serial_probe_fifos(struct atmel_uart_port *atmel_port,
> static int atmel_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct atmel_uart_port *atmel_port;
> - struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.parent->of_node;
> void *data;
> int ret = -ENODEV;
> bool rs485_enabled;
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(ATMEL_SERIAL_RINGSIZE & (ATMEL_SERIAL_RINGSIZE - 1));
>
> + /*
> + * In device tree there is no node with "atmel,at91rm9200-usart-serial"
> + * as compatible string. This driver is probed by at91-usart mfd driver
> + * which is just a wrapper over the atmel_serial driver and
> + * spi-at91-usart driver. All attributes needed by this driver are
> + * found in of_node of parent.
> + */
> + pdev->dev.of_node = np;
> +
> ret = of_alias_get_id(np, "serial");
> if (ret < 0)
> /* port id not found in platform data nor device-tree aliases:
> @@ -2860,6 +2871,7 @@ static int atmel_serial_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> clk_put(atmel_port->clk);
> atmel_port->clk = NULL;
> + pdev->dev.of_node = NULL;
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -2870,7 +2882,7 @@ static struct platform_driver atmel_serial_driver = {
> .suspend = atmel_serial_suspend,
> .resume = atmel_serial_resume,
> .driver = {
> - .name = "atmel_usart",
> + .name = "atmel_usart_serial",
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(atmel_serial_dt_ids),
> },
> };
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists