[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87imnggidr.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:28:32 +0100
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>, pbonzini@...hat.com,
rkrcmar@...hat.com, sean.j.christopherson@...el.com,
wanpengli@...cent.com, jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] KVM: x86: remove set but not used variable 'called'
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:58:54PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com> writes:
>>
>> > Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
>> >
>> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c: In function kvm_make_scan_ioapic_request_mask:
>> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:7911:7: warning: variable called set but not
>> > used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>> >
>> > It is not used since commit 7ee30bc132c6 ("KVM: x86: deliver KVM
>> > IOAPIC scan request to target vCPUs")
>>
>> Better expressed as
>>
>> Fixes: 7ee30bc132c6 ("KVM: x86: deliver KVM IOAPIC scan request to target vCPUs")
>>
>
> There is sort of a debate about this whether the Fixes tag should be
> used if it's only a cleanup.
>
I have to admit I'm involved in doing backporting sometimes and I really
appreciate Fixes: tags. Just so you know on which side of the debate I
am :-)
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists