lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09359c00-5769-0e0d-4af9-963897d3b498@suse.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:58:23 +0100
From:   Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
To:     Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Ping: [PATCH 0/2] x86/Xen/32: xen_iret_crit_fixup adjustments

On 11.11.2019 15:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The first patch here fixes another regression from 3c88c692c287
> ("x86/stackframe/32: Provide consistent pt_regs"), besides the
> one already addressed by
> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2019-10/msg01988.html.
> The second patch is a minimal bit of cleanup on top.
> 
> 1: make xen_iret_crit_fixup independent of frame layout
> 2: simplify xen_iret_crit_fixup's ring check

Seeing that the other regression fix has been taken into -tip,
what is the situation here? Should 5.4 really ship with this
still unfixed?

Jan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ