[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09359c00-5769-0e0d-4af9-963897d3b498@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:58:23 +0100
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Ping: [PATCH 0/2] x86/Xen/32: xen_iret_crit_fixup adjustments
On 11.11.2019 15:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The first patch here fixes another regression from 3c88c692c287
> ("x86/stackframe/32: Provide consistent pt_regs"), besides the
> one already addressed by
> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2019-10/msg01988.html.
> The second patch is a minimal bit of cleanup on top.
>
> 1: make xen_iret_crit_fixup independent of frame layout
> 2: simplify xen_iret_crit_fixup's ring check
Seeing that the other regression fix has been taken into -tip,
what is the situation here? Should 5.4 really ship with this
still unfixed?
Jan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists