[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191119133828.GA171084@google.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 07:38:28 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Nicholas Johnson <nicholas.johnson-opensource@...look.com.au>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com" <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"logang@...tatee.com" <logang@...tatee.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] PCI: Fix bug resulting in double hpmemsize being
assigned to MMIO window
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 03:17:04AM +0000, Nicholas Johnson wrote:
> I did just discover linux-next and I built it. Should I be doing this
> more often to help find regressions?
Yes, if you build and run linux-next, that's a great service because
it helps find problems before they appear in mainline.
> I will now concentrate on fixing the problem where pci=nocrs does not
> ignore the bus resource. One motherboard I own gives 00-7e or similar,
> instead of 00-ff. The nocrs does not help, and I had to patch the kernel
> myself. Only acpi=off fixes the problem, while knocking out SMT (MADT),
> IOMMU (DMAR) and the ability to suspend without crashing.
>
> If you disagree that nocrs should override bus resource, then let me
> know and I will not attempt this.
I guess the problem is that with "pci=nocrs", we ignore the MMIO and
I/O port resources from _CRS, but we still pay attention to bus number
resources in _CRS? That does sound like it would be unexpected
behavior.
I *would* like to see the complete dmesg log because these _CRS
methods are pretty reliable because Windows relies on them as well, so
problems are frequently a result of Linux defects. If we can fix
Linux or automatically work around issues so users don't have to use
"pci=nocrs" explicitly, that's the best.
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists