[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHrpVsV2Y4ZNRSJ58J0f_E0=aC8VfwvO56mfcdkXxCsJbAF3qA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:46:22 -0800
From: Jonathan Richardson <jonathan.richardson@...adcom.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jslaby@...e.com, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>,
Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>,
Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: console output duplicated when registering additional consoles
> > Thanks. It also needs to be cleared when the second console driver is
> > registered (of the same type, boot or normal)
>
> The second 'normal' console can be, for instance, netcon - it's sort
> of OK to have CON_PRINTBUFFER tty and CON_PRINTBUFFER netcon consoles.
OK I missed that case.
>
> Maybe
>
> > not just when a normal con replaces a bootconsole. A simple way of
> > avoiding the problem I'm seeing is to not even set the CON_PRINTBUFFER
> > flag on my consoles.
>
> This is up to the console driver to decide.
>
> > It skips the replay and the output on all consoles looks fine. The flag
> > is only used by register_console(), although I don't think that is the
> > intended usage? There are no console drivers that do this.
>
> Not sure I'm following. There are consoles that want all logbuf messages
> once those consoles are available.
I meant mine would be the only driver that didn't set CON_PRINTBUFFER.
Thanks for clarifying why it would be set. I guess what I didn't
understand is why are all the consoles updated (potentially) when a
new console is registered. As I mentioned before I can not set
CON_PRINTBUFFER to avoid the issue but it's probably not what I want.
I would possibly lose some of the log I guess if there was something
in the buffer during registration of the new console. So I tried the
patch but the issue remains as I originally described.
Thanks,
Jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists