[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191119213124.GO3079@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 22:31:24 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
vitaly.slobodskoy@...el.com, pavel.gerasimov@...el.com,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 03/13] perf tools: Support new branch sample type for
LBR TOS
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:00:00AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 6:35 AM <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> > index bb7b271397a6..c2da61c9ace7 100644
> > --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> > +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> > @@ -180,7 +180,10 @@ enum perf_branch_sample_type_shift {
> >
> > PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE_SHIFT = 16, /* save branch type */
> >
> > - PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX_SHIFT /* non-ABI */
> > + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX_SHIFT = 17, /* non-ABI */
> > +
> > + /* PMU specific */
>
> No! You must abstract this.
>
> > + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_LBR_TOS_SHIFT = 63, /* save LBR TOS */
> > };
> >
> I don't like this because this is too Intel specific.
> What is the meaning of this field? You need a clear definition so it can be used
> with other PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_* implementations.
I also detest the MSB usage. Normal pattern is that any bit >= MAX
will be rejected by the kernel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists