linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] coccinelle: platform_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d178b6b3-7ef1-4ad7-a747-d65249a9667a@web.de>
Date:   Tue, 19 Nov 2019 22:33:37 +0100
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] coccinelle: platform_get_irq: handle 2-statement
 branches

> From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>

I wonder about this information.
Would you like to use the tag “Suggested-by” instead?


…
> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_get_irq.cocci
> @@ -31,6 +31,25 @@ if ( \( ret < 0 \| ret <= 0 \) )
…
> +ret =
> +(
> +platform_get_irq
> +|
> +platform_get_irq_byname
> +)(E, ...);
> +
> +if ( \( ret < 0 \| ret <= 0 \) )
> +-{
> +-dev_err(...);
> +S
> +-}

How do you think about to use the following SmPL code variant?

+ ret =
+(platform_get_irq
+|platform_get_irq_byname
+)(E, ...);
+
+ if ( \( ret < 0 \| ret <= 0 \) )
+-{
+-dev_err(...);
+ S
+-}

Regards,
Markus