linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/12] powerpc: Replace cpu_up/down with device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87h830d5n8.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Tue, 19 Nov 2019 12:19:39 +1100
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Enrico Weigelt <info@...ux.net>, Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] powerpc: Replace cpu_up/down with device_online/offline

Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com> writes:
> The core device API performs extra housekeeping bits that are missing
> from directly calling cpu_up/down.
>
> See commit a6717c01ddc2 ("powerpc/rtas: use device model APIs and
> serialization during LPM") for an example description of what might go
> wrong.
>
> This also prepares to make cpu_up/down a private interface for anything
> but the cpu subsystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> CC: Enrico Weigelt <info@...ux.net>
> CC: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
> CC: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
> CC: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
> CC: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> CC: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

My initial though is "what about kdump", but that function is not called
during kdump, so there should be no issue with the extra locking leading
to deadlocks in a crash.

Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>

I assume you haven't actually tested it?

cheers

> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
> index 04a7cba58eff..ebf8cc7acc4d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
> @@ -208,13 +208,15 @@ static void wake_offline_cpus(void)
>  {
>  	int cpu = 0;
>  
> +	lock_device_hotplug();
>  	for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
>  		if (!cpu_online(cpu)) {
>  			printk(KERN_INFO "kexec: Waking offline cpu %d.\n",
>  			       cpu);
> -			WARN_ON(cpu_up(cpu));
> +			WARN_ON(device_online(get_cpu_device(cpu)));
>  		}
>  	}
> +	unlock_device_hotplug();
>  }
>  
>  static void kexec_prepare_cpus(void)
> -- 
> 2.17.1