[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191119051258.907487839@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:16:47 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 007/239] powerpc/perf: Fix kfree memory allocated for nest pmus
From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit 110df8bd3e418b3476cae80babe8add48a8ea523 upstream.
imc_common_cpuhp_mem_free() is the common function for all
IMC (In-memory Collection counters) domains to unregister cpuhotplug
callback and free memory. Since kfree of memory allocated for
nest-imc (per_nest_pmu_arr) is in the common code, all
domains (core/nest/thread) can do the kfree in the failure case.
This could potentially create a call trace as shown below, where
core(/thread/nest) imc pmu initialization fails and in the failure
path imc_common_cpuhp_mem_free() free the memory(per_nest_pmu_arr),
which is allocated by successfully registered nest units.
The call trace is generated in a scenario where core-imc
initialization is made to fail and a cpuhotplug is performed in a p9
system. During cpuhotplug ppc_nest_imc_cpu_offline() tries to access
per_nest_pmu_arr, which is already freed by core-imc.
NIP [c000000000cb6a94] mutex_lock+0x34/0x90
LR [c000000000cb6a88] mutex_lock+0x28/0x90
Call Trace:
mutex_lock+0x28/0x90 (unreliable)
perf_pmu_migrate_context+0x90/0x3a0
ppc_nest_imc_cpu_offline+0x190/0x1f0
cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x160/0x820
cpuhp_thread_fun+0x1bc/0x270
smpboot_thread_fn+0x250/0x290
kthread+0x1a8/0x1b0
ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x74
To address this scenario do the kfree(per_nest_pmu_arr) only in case
of nest-imc initialization failure, and when there is no other nest
units registered.
Fixes: 73ce9aec65b1 ("powerpc/perf: Fix IMC_MAX_PMU macro")
Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c
@@ -1189,6 +1189,7 @@ static void imc_common_cpuhp_mem_free(st
if (nest_pmus == 1) {
cpuhp_remove_state(CPUHP_AP_PERF_POWERPC_NEST_IMC_ONLINE);
kfree(nest_imc_refc);
+ kfree(per_nest_pmu_arr);
}
if (nest_pmus > 0)
@@ -1213,7 +1214,6 @@ static void imc_common_cpuhp_mem_free(st
kfree(pmu_ptr->attr_groups[IMC_EVENT_ATTR]->attrs);
kfree(pmu_ptr->attr_groups[IMC_EVENT_ATTR]);
kfree(pmu_ptr);
- kfree(per_nest_pmu_arr);
return;
}
@@ -1327,6 +1327,8 @@ int init_imc_pmu(struct device_node *par
ret = nest_pmu_cpumask_init();
if (ret) {
mutex_unlock(&nest_init_lock);
+ kfree(nest_imc_refc);
+ kfree(per_nest_pmu_arr);
goto err_free;
}
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists