linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 142/239] powerpc: Fix duplicate const clang warning in user access code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191119051331.777572659@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:19:02 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 142/239] powerpc: Fix duplicate const clang warning in user access code

From: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>

[ Upstream commit e00d93ac9a189673028ac125a74b9bc8ae73eebc ]

This re-applies commit b91c1e3e7a6f ("powerpc: Fix duplicate const
clang warning in user access code") (Jun 2015) which was undone in
commits:
  f2ca80905929 ("powerpc/sparse: Constify the address pointer in __get_user_nosleep()") (Feb 2017)
  d466f6c5cac1 ("powerpc/sparse: Constify the address pointer in __get_user_nocheck()") (Feb 2017)
  f84ed59a612d ("powerpc/sparse: Constify the address pointer in __get_user_check()") (Feb 2017)

We see a large number of duplicate const errors in the user access
code when building with llvm/clang:

  include/linux/pagemap.h:576:8: warning: duplicate 'const' declaration specifier [-Wduplicate-decl-specifier]
        ret = __get_user(c, uaddr);

The problem is we are doing const __typeof__(*(ptr)), which will hit
the warning if ptr is marked const.

Removing const does not seem to have any effect on GCC code
generation.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 51f00c00d7e49..3865d1d235976 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ do {								\
 ({								\
 	long __gu_err;						\
 	__long_type(*(ptr)) __gu_val;				\
-	const __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_addr = (ptr);	\
+	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_addr = (ptr);	\
 	__chk_user_ptr(ptr);					\
 	if (!is_kernel_addr((unsigned long)__gu_addr))		\
 		might_fault();					\
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ do {								\
 ({									\
 	long __gu_err = -EFAULT;					\
 	__long_type(*(ptr)) __gu_val = 0;				\
-	const __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_addr = (ptr);		\
+	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_addr = (ptr);		\
 	might_fault();							\
 	if (access_ok(VERIFY_READ, __gu_addr, (size))) {		\
 		barrier_nospec();					\
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ do {								\
 ({								\
 	long __gu_err;						\
 	__long_type(*(ptr)) __gu_val;				\
-	const __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_addr = (ptr);	\
+	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_addr = (ptr);	\
 	__chk_user_ptr(ptr);					\
 	barrier_nospec();					\
 	__get_user_size(__gu_val, __gu_addr, (size), __gu_err);	\
-- 
2.20.1