linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 01/19] x86/msr-index: Clean up bit defines for IA32_FEATURE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191120174810.GI2634@zn.tnic>
Date:   Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:48:10 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Tony W Wang-oc <TonyWWang-oc@...oxin.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/19] x86/msr-index: Clean up bit defines for
 IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 03:18:22PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Ugh.  Match the SDM unless it's obviously "wrong"?  :-)  It might literally
> be the only instance of the SDM using "on" instead of "enable(d)" for an
> MSR or CR bit.  The SDM even refers to it as an enable bit, e.g. "platform
> software has not enabled LMCE by setting IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL.LMCE_ON (bit 20)".
> 
> Whining aside, I'm ok going with LMCE_ON, I have a feeling "on" was
> deliberately chosen differentiate it from IA32_MCG_EXT_CTL.LMCE_EN.

Nah, ok, let's leave this as a one-off case where the SDM is simply
wrong but otherwise the bit names are correct and we keep them the same
as in the SDM to avoid obvious confusion.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette