linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] aspeed: fix snoop_file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <787e54c2-2fe3-4afc-a69b-94771726194b@www.fastmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:14:12 +1030
From:   "Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@...id.au>
To:     "Luc Van Oostenryck" <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Robert Lippert" <rlippert@...gle.com>,
        "Patrick Venture" <venture@...gle.com>
Cc:     "Joel Stanley" <joel@....id.au>, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aspeed: fix snoop_file_poll()'s return type

On Wed, 20 Nov 2019, at 10:36, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> snoop_file_poll() is defined as returning 'unsigned int' but the
> .poll method is declared as returning '__poll_t', a bitwise type.
> 
> Fix this by using the proper return type and using the EPOLL
> constants instead of the POLL ones, as required for __poll_t.
> 
> CC: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
> CC: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
> CC: linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org
> CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c 
> b/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
> index 48f7ac238861..f3d8d53ab84d 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
> @@ -97,13 +97,13 @@ static ssize_t snoop_file_read(struct file *file, 
> char __user *buffer,
>  	return ret ? ret : copied;
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned int snoop_file_poll(struct file *file,
> +static __poll_t snoop_file_poll(struct file *file,
>  				    struct poll_table_struct *pt)
>  {
>  	struct aspeed_lpc_snoop_channel *chan = snoop_file_to_chan(file);
>  
>  	poll_wait(file, &chan->wq, pt);
> -	return !kfifo_is_empty(&chan->fifo) ? POLLIN : 0;
> +	return !kfifo_is_empty(&chan->fifo) ? EPOLLIN : 0;

Looks fine to me as POLLIN and EPOLLIN evaluate to the same value despite
the type difference.

Patrick, Rob: can you take a look / test?

Andrew