lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1574234218-49195-5-git-send-email-decui@microsoft.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:16:58 -0800
From:   Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To:     kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
        sashal@...nel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mikelley@...rosoft.com,
        Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com
Cc:     Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] PCI: hv: kmemleak: Track the page allocations for struct hv_pcibus_device

The page allocated for struct hv_pcibus_device contains pointers to other
slab allocations in new_pcichild_device(). Since kmemleak does not track
and scan page allocations, the slab objects will be reported as leaks
(false positives). Use the kmemleak APIs to allow tracking of such pages.

Reported-by: Lili Deng <v-lide@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
---

This is actually v1. I use "v2" in the Subject just to be consistent with
the other patches in the patchset.

Without the patch, we can see the below warning in dmesg, if kmemleak is
enabled: 

kmemleak: 1 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)

and "cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak" shows:

unreferenced object 0xffff9217d1f2bec0 (size 192):
  comm "kworker/u256:7", pid 100821, jiffies 4501481057 (age 61409.997s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    a8 60 b1 63 17 92 ff ff a8 60 b1 63 17 92 ff ff  .`.c.....`.c....
    02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 92 cd 61 17 92 ff ff  ...........a....
  backtrace:
    [<0000000006f7ae93>] pci_devices_present_work+0x326/0x5e0 [pci_hyperv]
    [<00000000278eb88a>] process_one_work+0x15f/0x360
    [<00000000c59501e6>] worker_thread+0x49/0x3c0
    [<000000000a0a7a94>] kthread+0xf8/0x130
[<000000007075c2e7>] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40

 drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
index d7e05d436b5e..cc73f49c9e03 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
 #include <asm/irqdomain.h>
 #include <asm/apic.h>
 #include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/kmemleak.h>
 #include <linux/msi.h>
 #include <linux/hyperv.h>
 #include <linux/refcount.h>
@@ -2907,6 +2908,16 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev,
 	hbus = (struct hv_pcibus_device *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!hbus)
 		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	/*
+	 * kmemleak doesn't track page allocations as they are not commonly
+	 * used for kernel data structures, but here hbus->children indeed
+	 * contains pointers to hv_pci_dev structs, which are dynamically
+	 * created in new_pcichild_device(). Allow kmemleak to scan the page
+	 * so we don't get a false warning of memory leak.
+	 */
+	kmemleak_alloc(hbus, PAGE_SIZE, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+
 	hbus->state = hv_pcibus_init;
 
 	/*
@@ -3133,6 +3144,8 @@ static int hv_pci_remove(struct hv_device *hdev)
 
 	hv_put_dom_num(hbus->sysdata.domain);
 
+	/* Remove kmemleak object previously allocated in hv_pci_probe() */
+	kmemleak_free(hbus);
 	free_page((unsigned long)hbus);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.19.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ