[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191120004620.GB11061@richard>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 08:46:20 +0800
From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>,
n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/memory-failure.c: PageHuge is handled at the
beginning of memory_failure
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 01:23:54PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>On 18.11.19 09:20, Wei Yang wrote:
>> PageHuge is handled by memory_failure_hugetlb(), so this case could be
>> removed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> mm/memory-failure.c | 5 +----
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> index 3151c87dff73..392ac277b17d 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> @@ -1359,10 +1359,7 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>> * page_remove_rmap() in try_to_unmap_one(). So to determine page status
>> * correctly, we save a copy of the page flags at this time.
>> */
>> - if (PageHuge(p))
>> - page_flags = hpage->flags;
>> - else
>> - page_flags = p->flags;
>> + page_flags = p->flags;
>> /*
>> * unpoison always clear PG_hwpoison inside page lock
>>
>
>I somewhat miss a proper explanation why this is safe to do. We access page
>flags here, so why is it safe to refer to the ones of the sub-page?
>
Hi, David
I think your comment is on this line:
page_flags = p->flags;
Maybe we need to use this:
page_flags = hpage->flags;
And use hpage in the following or even the whole function?
While one thing interesting is not all "compound page" is PageCompound. For
some sub-page, we can't get the correct head. This means we may just check on
the sub-page.
>--
>
>Thanks,
>
>David / dhildenb
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
Powered by blists - more mailing lists