linux-kernel - [PATCH] of: property: Fix the semantics of of_is_ancestor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191120080230.16007-1-saravanak@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:02:29 -0800
From:   Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Cc:     Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] of: property: Fix the semantics of of_is_ancestor_of()

The of_is_ancestor_of() function was renamed from of_link_is_valid()
based on review feedback. The rename meant the semantics of the function
had to be inverted, but this was missed in the earlier patch.

So, fix the semantics of of_is_ancestor_of() and invert the conditional
expressions where it is used.

Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
---
 drivers/of/property.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
index dedbf82da838..0de1e7e69b6e 100644
--- a/drivers/of/property.c
+++ b/drivers/of/property.c
@@ -993,11 +993,11 @@ static bool of_is_ancestor_of(struct device_node *test_ancestor,
 	while (child) {
 		if (child == test_ancestor) {
 			of_node_put(child);
-			return false;
+			return true;
 		}
 		child = of_get_next_parent(child);
 	}
-	return true;
+	return false;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ static int of_link_to_phandle(struct device *dev, struct device_node *sup_np,
 	 * descendant nodes. By definition, a child node can't be a functional
 	 * dependency for the parent node.
 	 */
-	if (!of_is_ancestor_of(dev->of_node, sup_np)) {
+	if (of_is_ancestor_of(dev->of_node, sup_np)) {
 		dev_dbg(dev, "Not linking to %pOFP - is descendant\n", sup_np);
 		of_node_put(sup_np);
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.24.0.432.g9d3f5f5b63-goog