linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dma/debug: Fix dma vs cow-page collision detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hy_nNe8G0o8sMrz9A8HcdRzAuKgXmvdjKusAAA3Fow4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Nov 2019 17:23:40 -0800
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma/debug: Fix dma vs cow-page collision detection

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 4:02 PM Alexander Duyck
<alexander.duyck@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:49 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > The debug_dma_assert_idle() infrastructure was put in place to catch a
> > data corruption scenario first identified by the now defunct NET_DMA
> > receive offload feature. It caught cases where dma was in flight to a
> > stale page because the dma raced the cpu writing the page, and the cpu
> > write triggered cow_user_page().
> >
> > However, the dma-debug tracking is overeager and also triggers in cases
> > where the dma device is reading from a page that is also undergoing
> > cow_user_page().
> >
> > The fix proposed was originally posted in 2016, and Russell reported
> > "Yes, that seems to avoid the warning for me from an initial test", and
> > now Don is also reporting that this fix is addressing a similar false
> > positive report that he is seeing.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAPcyv4j8fWqwAaX5oCdg5atc+vmp57HoAGT6AfBFwaCiv0RbAQ@mail.gmail.com
> > Reported-by: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> > Reported-by: Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>
> > Fixes: 0abdd7a81b7e ("dma-debug: introduce debug_dma_assert_idle()")
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> > Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/dma/debug.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/dma/debug.c b/kernel/dma/debug.c
> > index 099002d84f46..11a6db53d193 100644
> > --- a/kernel/dma/debug.c
> > +++ b/kernel/dma/debug.c
> > @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ void debug_dma_assert_idle(struct page *page)
> >         }
> >         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&radix_lock, flags);
> >
> > -       if (!entry)
> > +       if (!entry || entry->direction != DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
> >                 return;
> >
> >         cln = to_cacheline_number(entry);
>
> If I am understanding right DMA_TO_DEVICE is fine, but won't  you also
> need to cover the DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL case since it is possible for a
> device to also write the memory in that case?

True, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL and DMA_TO_DEVICE are being treated equally in
this case. Given this is the second time this facility needed to be
taught to be less eager [1], I'd be inclined to let the tie-break /
BIDIR case be treated like TO. This facility was always meant as a
"there might be a problem here", but not a definitive checker, and it
certainly loses value if the reports are ambiguous.

[1]: 3b7a6418c749 dma debug: account for cachelines and read-only
mappings in overlap tracking