[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <656c0af1-6c56-8a08-ff86-745409f6968c@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 13:21:35 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] KVM: vmx: implement MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL disable RTM
functionality
On 19/11/19 22:06, Jim Mattson wrote:
>> + switch (index) {
>> + case MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL:
>> + /* No need to pass TSX_CTRL_CPUID_CLEAR through. */
>> + vmx->guest_msrs[j].mask = ~(u64)TSX_CTRL_CPUID_CLEAR;
>> + break;
> Why even bother with the special case here? Does this make the wrmsr faster?
>
No, but it can avoid the wrmsr altogether if the guest uses the same
DISABLE_RTM setting but a different value for CPUID_CLEAR.
More important, while I am confident re-enabling TSX while in the kernel
and only restoring MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL on return to userspace, I'm more
wary of changing CPUID bits while the kernel is running. I will update
the comment.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists