linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16 10/83] sched/fair: Don't free p->numa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 20 Nov 2019 15:37:20 +0000
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Will Deacon" <will@...nel.org>, "Petr Mladek" <pmladek@...e.com>,
        "Jann Horn" <jannh@...gle.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "Sergey Senozhatsky" <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 10/83] sched/fair: Don't free p->numa_faults with
 concurrent readers

3.16.78-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>

commit 16d51a590a8ce3befb1308e0e7ab77f3b661af33 upstream.

When going through execve(), zero out the NUMA fault statistics instead of
freeing them.

During execve, the task is reachable through procfs and the scheduler. A
concurrent /proc/*/sched reader can read data from a freed ->numa_faults
allocation (confirmed by KASAN) and write it back to userspace.
I believe that it would also be possible for a use-after-free read to occur
through a race between a NUMA fault and execve(): task_numa_fault() can
lead to task_numa_compare(), which invokes task_weight() on the currently
running task of a different CPU.

Another way to fix this would be to make ->numa_faults RCU-managed or add
extra locking, but it seems easier to wipe the NUMA fault statistics on
execve.

Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Fixes: 82727018b0d3 ("sched/numa: Call task_numa_free() from do_execve()")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190716152047.14424-1-jannh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust filename, context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1589,7 +1589,7 @@ static int do_execve_common(struct filen
 	current->fs->in_exec = 0;
 	current->in_execve = 0;
 	acct_update_integrals(current);
-	task_numa_free(current);
+	task_numa_free(current, false);
 	free_bprm(bprm);
 	putname(filename);
 	if (displaced)
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1671,7 +1671,7 @@ struct task_struct {
 extern void task_numa_fault(int last_node, int node, int pages, int flags);
 extern pid_t task_numa_group_id(struct task_struct *p);
 extern void set_numabalancing_state(bool enabled);
-extern void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p);
+extern void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p, bool final);
 extern bool should_numa_migrate_memory(struct task_struct *p, struct page *page,
 					int src_nid, int dst_cpu);
 #else
@@ -1686,7 +1686,7 @@ static inline pid_t task_numa_group_id(s
 static inline void set_numabalancing_state(bool enabled)
 {
 }
-static inline void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p)
+static inline void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p, bool final)
 {
 }
 static inline bool should_numa_migrate_memory(struct task_struct *p,
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ void __put_task_struct(struct task_struc
 	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&tsk->usage));
 	WARN_ON(tsk == current);
 
-	task_numa_free(tsk);
+	task_numa_free(tsk, true);
 	security_task_free(tsk);
 	exit_creds(tsk);
 	delayacct_tsk_free(tsk);
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1747,13 +1747,23 @@ no_join:
 	return;
 }
 
-void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p)
+/*
+ * Get rid of NUMA staticstics associated with a task (either current or dead).
+ * If @final is set, the task is dead and has reached refcount zero, so we can
+ * safely free all relevant data structures. Otherwise, there might be
+ * concurrent reads from places like load balancing and procfs, and we should
+ * reset the data back to default state without freeing ->numa_faults.
+ */
+void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p, bool final)
 {
 	struct numa_group *grp = p->numa_group;
-	void *numa_faults = p->numa_faults_memory;
+	unsigned long *numa_faults = p->numa_faults_memory;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int i;
 
+	if (!numa_faults)
+		return;
+
 	if (grp) {
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&grp->lock, flags);
 		for (i = 0; i < NR_NUMA_HINT_FAULT_STATS * nr_node_ids; i++)
@@ -1767,11 +1777,17 @@ void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *
 		put_numa_group(grp);
 	}
 
-	p->numa_faults_memory = NULL;
-	p->numa_faults_buffer_memory = NULL;
-	p->numa_faults_cpu= NULL;
-	p->numa_faults_buffer_cpu = NULL;
-	kfree(numa_faults);
+	if (final) {
+		p->numa_faults_memory = NULL;
+		p->numa_faults_buffer_memory = NULL;
+		p->numa_faults_cpu = NULL;
+		p->numa_faults_buffer_cpu = NULL;
+		kfree(numa_faults);
+	} else {
+		p->total_numa_faults = 0;
+		for (i = 0; i < NR_NUMA_HINT_FAULT_STATS * nr_node_ids; i++)
+			numa_faults[i] = 0;
+	}
 }
 
 /*