[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1574264230.887661069@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 15:37:50 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"syzbot" <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 40/83] net/packet: fix race in tpacket_snd()
3.16.78-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
commit 32d3182cd2cd29b2e7e04df7b0db350fbe11289f upstream.
packet_sendmsg() checks tx_ring.pg_vec to decide
if it must call tpacket_snd().
Problem is that the check is lockless, meaning another thread
can issue a concurrent setsockopt(PACKET_TX_RING ) to flip
tx_ring.pg_vec back to NULL.
Given that tpacket_snd() grabs pg_vec_lock mutex, we can
perform the check again to solve the race.
syzbot reported :
kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled
kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
CPU: 1 PID: 11429 Comm: syz-executor394 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc4+ #101
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
RIP: 0010:packet_lookup_frame+0x8d/0x270 net/packet/af_packet.c:474
Code: c1 ee 03 f7 73 0c 80 3c 0e 00 0f 85 cb 01 00 00 48 8b 0b 89 c0 4c 8d 24 c1 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 e1 48 c1 e9 03 <80> 3c 01 00 0f 85 94 01 00 00 48 8d 7b 10 4d 8b 3c 24 48 b8 00 00
RSP: 0018:ffff88809f82f7b8 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff8880a45c7030 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 1ffff110148b8e06 RDI: ffff8880a45c703c
RBP: ffff88809f82f7e8 R08: ffff888087aea200 R09: fffffbfff134ae50
R10: fffffbfff134ae4f R11: ffffffff89a5727f R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8880a45c6ac0 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 00007fa04716f700(0000) GS:ffff8880ae900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fa04716edb8 CR3: 0000000091eb4000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
packet_current_frame net/packet/af_packet.c:487 [inline]
tpacket_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:2667 [inline]
packet_sendmsg+0x590/0x6250 net/packet/af_packet.c:2975
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:637 [inline]
sock_sendmsg+0xd7/0x130 net/socket.c:657
___sys_sendmsg+0x3e2/0x920 net/socket.c:2311
__sys_sendmmsg+0x1bf/0x4d0 net/socket.c:2413
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2442 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2439 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0x9d/0x100 net/socket.c:2439
do_syscall_64+0xfd/0x6a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:296
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
Fixes: 69e3c75f4d54 ("net: TX_RING and packet mmap")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
net/packet/af_packet.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -2286,6 +2286,13 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_soc
mutex_lock(&po->pg_vec_lock);
+ /* packet_sendmsg() check on tx_ring.pg_vec was lockless,
+ * we need to confirm it under protection of pg_vec_lock.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!po->tx_ring.pg_vec)) {
+ err = -EBUSY;
+ goto out;
+ }
if (likely(saddr == NULL)) {
dev = packet_cached_dev_get(po);
proto = po->num;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists