linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.16 81/83] btrfs: partially apply b8b93addde

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d8b529f2-fce3-829a-c157-77d574619daf@knorrie.org>
Date:   Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:56:28 +0100
From:   Hans van Kranenburg <hans@...rrie.org>
To:     Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 81/83] btrfs: partially apply b8b93addde

On 11/20/19 4:38 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3.16.78-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> ------------------
> 
> From: Hans van Kranenburg <hans@...rrie.org>

Thanks for picking this up!

Can you please use my work email, lowercase

  hans.van.kranenburg@...dix.com

for this one and for the Cc: line in the second one from Qu?

Thanks,
Hans

> 
> Extracted from commit b8b93addde "btrfs: cleanup 64bit/32bit divs,
> provably bounded values", to allow commits 793ff2c88c6 "btrfs:
> volumes: Cleanup stripe size calculation" and baf92114c7 "btrfs:
> alloc_chunk: fix more DUP stripe size handling" to apply cleanly.
> 
> [bwh: Add patch description]
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 4aa1a20fc5d7..b4b98a75ca8b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -4274,8 +4274,8 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>  	 */
>  	if (stripe_size * data_stripes > max_chunk_size) {
>  		u64 mask = (1ULL << 24) - 1;
> -		stripe_size = max_chunk_size;
> -		do_div(stripe_size, data_stripes);
> +
> +		stripe_size = div_u64(max_chunk_size, data_stripes);
>  
>  		/* bump the answer up to a 16MB boundary */
>  		stripe_size = (stripe_size + mask) & ~mask;
>