[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191121202140.GA7573@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:21:40 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 241/422] net: socionext: Fix two
sleep-in-atomic-context bugs in ave_rxfifo_reset()
Hi!
> [ Upstream commit 0020f5c807ef67954d9210eea0ba17a6134cdf7d ]
>
> The driver may sleep with holding a spinlock.
> The function call paths (from bottom to top) in Linux-4.17 are:
>
> [FUNC] usleep_range
> drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c, 892:
> usleep_range in ave_rxfifo_reset
> drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c, 932:
> ave_rxfifo_reset in ave_irq_handler
>
> [FUNC] usleep_range
> drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c, 888:
> usleep_range in ave_rxfifo_reset
> drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c, 932:
> ave_rxfifo_reset in ave_irq_handler
>
> To fix these bugs, usleep_range() is replaced with udelay().
I don't believe this is serious enough for -stable, but more
importantly:
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c
> @@ -906,11 +906,11 @@ static void ave_rxfifo_reset(struct net_device *ndev)
>
> /* assert reset */
> writel(AVE_GRR_RXFFR, priv->base + AVE_GRR);
> - usleep_range(40, 50);
> + udelay(50);
>
> /* negate reset */
> writel(0, priv->base + AVE_GRR);
> - usleep_range(10, 20);
> + udelay(20);
>
udelay(40) / udelay(10) should be enough here.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists