[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7hlfs8n67y.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 15:46:09 -0800
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: meson8: fix the size of the PMU registers
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com> writes:
> The PMU registers are at least 0x18 bytes wide. Meson8b already uses a
> size of 0x18. The structure of the PMU registers on Meson8 and Meson8b
> is similar but not identical.
>
> Meson8 and Meson8b have the following registers in common (starting at
> AOBUS + 0xe0):
> #define AO_RTI_PWR_A9_CNTL0 0xe0 (0x38 << 2)
> #define AO_RTI_PWR_A9_CNTL1 0xe4 (0x39 << 2)
> #define AO_RTI_GEN_PWR_SLEEP0 0xe8 (0x3a << 2)
> #define AO_RTI_GEN_PWR_ISO0 0x4c (0x3b << 2)
>
> Meson8b additionally has these three registers:
> #define AO_RTI_GEN_PWR_ACK0 0xf0 (0x3c << 2)
> #define AO_RTI_PWR_A9_MEM_PD0 0xf4 (0x3d << 2)
> #define AO_RTI_PWR_A9_MEM_PD1 0xf8 (0x3e << 2)
>
> Thus we can assume that the register size of the PMU IP blocks is
> identical on both SoCs (and Meson8 just contains some reserved registers
> in that area) because the CEC registers start right after the PMU
> (AO_RTI_*) registers at AOBUS + 0x100 (0x40 << 2).
>
> The upcoming power domain driver will need to read and write the
> AO_RTI_GEN_PWR_SLEEP0 and AO_RTI_GEN_PWR_ISO0 registers, so the updated
> size is needed for that driver to work.
>
> Fixes: 4a5a27116b447d ("ARM: dts: meson8: add support for booting the secondary CPU cores")
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Queued as a fix for v5.5-rc,
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists