[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gngO04iWuKu2_DV4_AXw5yssd6njTNKF=eKk+YJw3AfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:27:43 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Jing Lin <jing.lin@...el.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Kumar, Sanjay K" <sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com>,
"Dey, Megha" <megha.dey@...el.com>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/14] x86/asm: add iosubmit_cmds512() based on
movdir64b CPU instruction
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 3:27 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 03:19:23PM -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > That's the underlying functionality of the MOVDIR64B instruction. A
> > posted write so no way to know if it succeeded.
>
> So how do you know whether any of the writes went through?
It's identical to the writel() mmio-write to start a SATA command
transfer. The higher level device driver protocol validates that the
command went through, ultimately with a timeout. There's no return
value for iosubmit_cmds512() for the same reason there's no return
value for the other iowrite primitives.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists