[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191121083523.GL4097@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:35:23 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the nfsd tree
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 02:28:33PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
>
> include/trace/events/rpcrdma.h
>
> between commit:
>
> 832b2cb95543 ("svcrdma: Improve DMA mapping trace points")
>
> from the nfsd tree and commit:
>
> 60fdad00827c ("ftrace: Rework event_create_dir()")
>
> from the tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just used the former) and can carry the fix as
Yes, that looks right. All I did was remove that stray ';' anyway, which
the nfs patch did too.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists