[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191121094643.GD439743@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:46:43 +0000
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] vsock: add local transport support
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:01:15PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> This series introduces a new transport (vsock_loopback) to handle
> local communication.
> This could be useful to test vsock core itself and to allow developers
> to test their applications without launching a VM.
>
> Before this series, vmci and virtio transports allowed this behavior,
> but only in the guest.
> We are moving the loopback handling in a new transport, because it
> might be useful to provide this feature also in the host or when
> no H2G/G2H transports (hyperv, virtio, vmci) are loaded.
>
> The user can use the loopback with the new VMADDR_CID_LOCAL (that
> replaces VMADDR_CID_RESERVED) in any condition.
> Otherwise, if the G2H transport is loaded, it can also use the guest
> local CID as previously supported by vmci and virtio transports.
> If G2H transport is not loaded, the user can also use VMADDR_CID_HOST
> for local communication.
>
> Patch 1 is a cleanup to build virtio_transport_common without virtio
> Patch 2 adds the new VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, replacing VMADDR_CID_RESERVED
> Patch 3 adds a new feature flag to register a loopback transport
> Patch 4 adds the new vsock_loopback transport based on the loopback
> implementation of virtio_transport
> Patch 5 implements the logic to use the local transport for loopback
> communication
> Patch 6 removes the loopback from virtio_transport
>
> @Jorgen: Do you think it might be a problem to replace
> VMADDR_CID_RESERVED with VMADDR_CID_LOCAL?
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
> Stefano Garzarella (6):
> vsock/virtio_transport_common: remove unused virtio header includes
> vsock: add VMADDR_CID_LOCAL definition
> vsock: add local transport support in the vsock core
> vsock: add vsock_loopback transport
> vsock: use local transport when it is loaded
> vsock/virtio: remove loopback handling
>
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> include/net/af_vsock.h | 2 +
> include/uapi/linux/vm_sockets.h | 8 +-
> net/vmw_vsock/Kconfig | 12 ++
> net/vmw_vsock/Makefile | 1 +
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 49 +++++-
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 61 +------
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 3 -
> net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c | 2 +-
> net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c | 217 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 10 files changed, 283 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
Please see my comments. Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists