Message-ID: <CAJiuCcd3p-=G9TEadARPmCs6cS7gi61M4CaxX17=NOHwo9onzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:38:03 +0100
From:   Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <pza@...gutronix.de>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/8] pwm: sun4i: Add support to output source clock directly

Hi Uwe,

On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 at 08:36, Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> Hello Clément,
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 06:53:16PM +0100, Clément Péron wrote:
> > From: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
> >
> > PWM core has an option to bypass whole logic and output unchanged source
> > clock as PWM output. This is achieved by enabling bypass bit.
> >
> > Note that when bypass is enabled, no other setting has any meaning, not
> > even enable bit.
> >
> > This mode of operation is needed to achieve high enough frequency to
> > serve as clock source for AC200 chip which is integrated into same
> > package as H6 SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> > index ce83d479ba0e..a1d8851b18f0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> > @@ -3,6 +3,10 @@
> >   * Driver for Allwinner sun4i Pulse Width Modulation Controller
> >   *
> >   * Copyright (C) 2014 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> > + *
> > + * Limitations:
> > + * - When outputing the source clock directly, the PWM logic will be bypassed
> > + *   and the currently running period is not guaranteed to be completed
> >   */
> >
> >  #include <linux/bitops.h>
> > @@ -73,6 +77,7 @@ static const u32 prescaler_table[] = {
> >
> >  struct sun4i_pwm_data {
> >       bool has_prescaler_bypass;
> > +     bool has_direct_mod_clk_output;
> >       unsigned int npwm;
> >  };
> >
> > @@ -118,6 +123,20 @@ static void sun4i_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> >
> >       val = sun4i_pwm_readl(sun4i_pwm, PWM_CTRL_REG);
> >
> > +     /*
> > +      * PWM chapter in H6 manual has a diagram which explains that if bypass
> > +      * bit is set, no other setting has any meaning. Even more, experiment
> > +      * proved that also enable bit is ignored in this case.
> > +      */
> > +     if ((val & BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm)) &&
> > +         sun4i_pwm->data->has_direct_mod_clk_output) {
> > +             state->period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, clk_rate);
> > +             state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(state->period, 2);
> > +             state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
> > +             state->enabled = true;
> > +             return;
> > +     }
> > +
> >       if ((PWM_REG_PRESCAL(val, pwm->hwpwm) == PWM_PRESCAL_MASK) &&
> >           sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass)
> >               prescaler = 1;
> > @@ -149,13 +168,23 @@ static void sun4i_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> >
> >  static int sun4i_pwm_calculate(struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm,
> >                              const struct pwm_state *state,
> > -                            u32 *dty, u32 *prd, unsigned int *prsclr)
> > +                            u32 *dty, u32 *prd, unsigned int *prsclr,
> > +                            bool *bypass)
> >  {
> >       u64 clk_rate, div = 0;
> >       unsigned int pval, prescaler = 0;
> >
> >       clk_rate = clk_get_rate(sun4i_pwm->clk);
> >
> > +     *bypass = state->enabled &&
> > +               (state->period * clk_rate >= NSEC_PER_SEC) &&
> > +               (state->period * clk_rate < 2 * NSEC_PER_SEC) &&
> > +               (state->duty_cycle * clk_rate * 2 >= NSEC_PER_SEC);
> > +
> > +     /* Skip calculation of other parameters if we bypass them */
> > +     if (*bypass && sun4i_pwm->data->has_direct_mod_clk_output)
> > +             return 0;
> > +
>
> Hmm, so if my PWM doesn't support the bypass bit *bypass might still be
> true on return of sun4i_pwm_calculate. It doesn't hurt because the value
> is only used after another check of has_direct_mod_clk_output, but still
> this is a bit confusing.

Ok will change this

>
> >       if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass) {
> >               /* First, test without any prescaler when available */
> >               prescaler = PWM_PRESCAL_MASK;
> > @@ -202,10 +231,11 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> >  {
> >       struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm = to_sun4i_pwm_chip(chip);
> >       struct pwm_state cstate;
> > -     u32 ctrl;
> > +     u32 ctrl, period, duty, val;
> >       int ret;
> > -     unsigned int delay_us;
> > +     unsigned int delay_us, prescaler;
> >       unsigned long now;
> > +     bool bypass;
> >
> >       pwm_get_state(pwm, &cstate);
> >
> > @@ -220,43 +250,48 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> >       spin_lock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
> >       ctrl = sun4i_pwm_readl(sun4i_pwm, PWM_CTRL_REG);
> >
> > -     if ((cstate.period != state->period) ||
> > -         (cstate.duty_cycle != state->duty_cycle)) {
> > -             u32 period, duty, val;
> > -             unsigned int prescaler;n write the register and return
But
> > +     ret = sun4i_pwm_calculate(sun4i_pwm, state, &duty, &period, &prescaler,
> > +                               &bypass);
> > +     if (ret) {
> > +             dev_err(chip->dev, "period exceeds the maximum value\n");
> > +             spin_unlock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
> > +             if (!cstate.enabled)
> > +                     clk_disable_unprepare(sun4i_pwm->clk);
> > +             return ret;
> > +     }
> >
> > -             ret = sun4i_pwm_calculate(sun4i_pwm, state,
> > -                                       &duty, &period, &prescaler);
> > -             if (ret) {
> > -                     dev_err(chip->dev, "period exceeds the maximum value\n");
> > -                     spin_unlock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
> > -                     if (!cstate.enabled)
> > -                             clk_disable_unprepare(sun4i_pwm->clk);
> > -                     return ret;
>
> This would be a bit easier to review if this commit was split into two
> patches. One that drops the check for cstate.period != state->period etc
> (which otherwise is nearly empty when ignoring whitespace changes), and
> a second that then adds bypass support.

Ok

>
>
> > +     if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_direct_mod_clk_output) {
> > +             if (bypass) {
> > +                     ctrl |= BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm);
> > +                     /* We can skip apply of other parameters */
> > +                     goto bypass_mode;
>
> I would prefer to use goto only for error handling. Not sure if there is
> a nice way to do that.

As the PWM is necessarily enabled we can write the register and return
but not sure it's more proper.

sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, ctrl, PWM_CTRL_REG);
spin_unlock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
return 0;

Regards,
Clément

>
> > +             } else {
> > +                     ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm);
> >               }
> > +     }
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Powered by blists - more mailing lists