[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191121120047.GA429384@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:00:47 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: property: Fix the semantics of of_is_ancestor_of()
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 01:50:42PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 7:36 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:02:29AM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > The of_is_ancestor_of() function was renamed from of_link_is_valid()
> > > based on review feedback. The rename meant the semantics of the function
> > > had to be inverted, but this was missed in the earlier patch.
> > >
> > > So, fix the semantics of of_is_ancestor_of() and invert the conditional
> > > expressions where it is used.
> > >
> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/of/property.c | 6 +++---
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > What git commit does this patch fix?
> >
>
> Fixes commit a3e1d1a7f5fcc. Let me know if you want me to send a v2 or
> if you can fix up the commit text on your end.
I'll fix it up.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists