linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 2/5] IMA: Define an IMA hook to measure keys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <21c08fdf-43d7-67e0-1cb5-66bdbce1b6ad@linux.microsoft.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:32:03 -0800
From:   Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>
Cc:     linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        keyrings@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/5] IMA: Define an IMA hook to measure keys

On 11/20/19 5:22 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:

>> I had the following check in process_buffer_measurement() as part of my
>> patch, but removed it since it is being upstreamed separately (by Mimi)
>>
>>    if (!ima_policy_flag)
>>    	return;
> 
> Did you post it as a separate patch?  I can't seem to find it.
> 
> Mimi

No - I removed the above change from my patch since you mentioned it's 
being upstreamed separately.

I didn't realize you wanted me to include the above change alone in a 
separate patch (in my patch set). Sorry - I guess I misunderstood.

I can do that when I send an update - I expect to by the end of this week.

thanks,
  -lakshmi