[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZvED9He0gcCzYMs_q1=-RzEfUgoP11HEW-cNDg1fgnvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 15:13:20 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc: "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"phil.edworthy@...esas.com" <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
"dmurphy@...com" <dmurphy@...com>,
"linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"mchehab+samsung@...nel.org" <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
"alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"jacek.anaszewski@...il.com" <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
"mazziesaccount@...il.com" <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com" <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
"m.szyprowski@...sung.com" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"hofrat@...dl.org" <hofrat@...dl.org>,
"bgolaszewski@...libre.com" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/16] gpio: devres: Add devm_gpiod_get_parent_array
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 6:54 PM Vaittinen, Matti
<Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com> wrote:
> [Me]
> > So what is this? NULL?
>
> Here we don't have separate manager device - thus the manager is NULL
> -and the consumer device ("dev" here) is what we use to manage GPIO.
>
> >
> > Doesn't that mean you just removed all resource management for this
> > call?
>
> No :)
>
> >
> > Or am I reading it wrong?
>
> Either you are reading it wrong or I am writing it wrong xD. In any
> case this means I need to drop few comments in code :) Thanks.
I was reading it wrong, so not your bad. I guess lack of focus on
my side, this part is fine!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists