linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] virtiofs: Add an index to keep track of first request queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:00:45 +0000
From:   Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
To:     Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc:     virtio-fs@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dgilbert@...hat.com,
        miklos@...redi.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] virtiofs: Add an index to keep track of first
 request queue

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 03:57:03PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> @@ -990,7 +994,7 @@ static int virtio_fs_enqueue_req(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq,
>  static void virtio_fs_wake_pending_and_unlock(struct fuse_iqueue *fiq)
>  __releases(fiq->lock)
>  {
> -	unsigned int queue_id = VQ_REQUEST; /* TODO multiqueue */
> +	unsigned int queue_id;
>  	struct virtio_fs *fs;
>  	struct fuse_req *req;
>  	struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq;

Sorry, I removed too much context in my reply.  This TODO...

> @@ -1004,6 +1008,7 @@ __releases(fiq->lock)
>  	spin_unlock(&fiq->lock);
>  
>  	fs = fiq->priv;
> +	queue_id = fs->first_reqq_idx;

...should be moved here.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)