[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191121165348.GC4905@willie-the-truck>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:53:48 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: treat dev->bus_dma_mask as a DMA limit
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 05:02:17PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:55:39PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > Hmm, there's no functional dependency though, is there? AFAICS it's
> > essentially just a context conflict. Is it worth simply dropping (or
> > postponing) the local renaming in __dma_direct_optimal_gfp_mask(), or
> > perhaps even cross-merging arm64/for-next/zone-dma into dma/for-next?
>
> I would have no problem with pulling it in. I'd kinda hate creating
> the conflict, though. So if the arm64 maintainers are fine with it
> I'll pull it in, especially if I get an ACK from Robin.
Please go ahead and pull in our for-next/zone-dma branch if you need it.
We're not going to rebase it, and I suspect we won't even be queueing
anything else there at this stage in the game.
Cheers,
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists