[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3481175cbe14457a947f934343946d52@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:43:51 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Ingo Molnar' <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v10 6/6] x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by
kernel parameter
From: Ingo Molnar
> Sent: 21 November 2019 17:12
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
...
> > This feature MUST be default enabled, otherwise everything will
> > be/remain broken and we'll end up in the situation where you can't use
> > it even if you wanted to.
>
> Agreed.
Before it can be enabled by default someone needs to go through the
kernel and fix all the code that abuses the 'bit' functions by using them
on int[] instead of long[].
I've only seen one fix go through for one use case of one piece of code
that repeatedly uses potentially misaligned int[] arrays for bitmasks.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists