linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 154/222] libata: have ata_scsi_rw_xlat() fail invalid passthrough requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191122100913.838547114@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:28:14 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Krishna Ram Prakash R <krp@...x.in>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 154/222] libata: have ata_scsi_rw_xlat() fail invalid passthrough requests

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>

commit 2d7271501720038381d45fb3dcbe4831228fc8cc upstream.

For passthrough requests, libata-scsi takes what the user passes in
as gospel. This can be problematic if the user fills in the CDB
incorrectly. One example of that is in request sizes. For read/write
commands, the CDB contains fields describing the transfer length of
the request. These should match with the SG_IO header fields, but
libata-scsi currently does no validation of that.

Check that the number of blocks in the CDB for passthrough requests
matches what was mapped into the request. If the CDB asks for more
data then the validated SG_IO header fields, error it.

Reported-by: Krishna Ram Prakash R <krp@...x.in>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -1734,6 +1734,21 @@ nothing_to_do:
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static bool ata_check_nblocks(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, u32 n_blocks)
+{
+	struct request *rq = scmd->request;
+	u32 req_blocks;
+
+	if (!blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq))
+		return true;
+
+	req_blocks = blk_rq_bytes(rq) / scmd->device->sector_size;
+	if (n_blocks > req_blocks)
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /**
  *	ata_scsi_rw_xlat - Translate SCSI r/w command into an ATA one
  *	@qc: Storage for translated ATA taskfile
@@ -1776,6 +1791,8 @@ static unsigned int ata_scsi_rw_xlat(str
 		scsi_10_lba_len(cdb, &block, &n_block);
 		if (cdb[1] & (1 << 3))
 			tf_flags |= ATA_TFLAG_FUA;
+		if (!ata_check_nblocks(scmd, n_block))
+			goto invalid_fld;
 		break;
 	case READ_6:
 	case WRITE_6:
@@ -1790,6 +1807,8 @@ static unsigned int ata_scsi_rw_xlat(str
 		 */
 		if (!n_block)
 			n_block = 256;
+		if (!ata_check_nblocks(scmd, n_block))
+			goto invalid_fld;
 		break;
 	case READ_16:
 	case WRITE_16:
@@ -1800,6 +1819,8 @@ static unsigned int ata_scsi_rw_xlat(str
 		scsi_16_lba_len(cdb, &block, &n_block);
 		if (cdb[1] & (1 << 3))
 			tf_flags |= ATA_TFLAG_FUA;
+		if (!ata_check_nblocks(scmd, n_block))
+			goto invalid_fld;
 		break;
 	default:
 		DPRINTK("no-byte command\n");