lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 22 Nov 2019 15:10:09 +0100
From:   Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] dt-bindings: arm: Document compatibles for Ux500
 boards

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 09:22:19PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 7:20 PM Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net> wrote:
> 
> > The device-specific compatible values used by the Ux500 boards
> > were not documented so far. Add a new simple schema to document them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
> 
> Nice, thanks!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> 
> I expect Rob to merge these patches as they are bindings-only,
> alternatively I can take them in the Ux500 DTS pull request
> for the next kernel cycle.
> 

For this patch it would be easier if you take it through the Ux500 tree,
as I have another patch series that adds a new board to it.

The vendor-prefix patches are independent, so Rob can merge them if that
is easier?

Thanks,
Stephan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ