[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <899466e7f4f24b45c2765d55f854fbc4@walle.cc>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:25:25 +0100
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: Wen He <wen.he_1@....com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, mturquette@...libre.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
sboyd@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [v9 2/2] clk: ls1028a: Add clock driver for Display
output interface
Am 2019-11-21 17:04, schrieb Wen He:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
>> Sent: 2019年11月20日 22:36
>> To: Wen He <wen.he_1@....com>
>> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org; Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>;
>> linux-clk@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>> mark.rutland@....com; mturquette@...libre.com; robh+dt@...nel.org;
>> sboyd@...nel.org
>> Subject: [EXT] Re: [v9 2/2] clk: ls1028a: Add clock driver for Display
>> output
>> interface
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>
> Hi Michael,
>
>>
>> > Add clock driver for QorIQ LS1028A Display output interfaces(LCD,
>> > DPHY), as implemented in TSMC CLN28HPM PLL, this PLL supports the
>> > programmable integer division and range of the display output pixel
>> > clock's 27-594MHz.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Wen He <wen.he_1@....com>
>> > ---
>> > change in v9:
>> > - Use the fixed mfd in plldig_set_rate
>> >
>> > drivers/clk/Kconfig | 10 ++
>> > drivers/clk/Makefile | 1 +
>> > drivers/clk/clk-plldig.c | 297
>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > 3 files changed, 308 insertions(+)
>> > create mode 100644 drivers/clk/clk-plldig.c
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/Kconfig index
>> > 0530bebfc25a..9f6b0196c604 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig
>> > +++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
>> > @@ -218,6 +218,16 @@ config CLK_QORIQ
>> > This adds the clock driver support for Freescale QorIQ platforms
>> > using common clock framework.
>> >
>> > +config CLK_LS1028A_PLLDIG
>> > + tristate "Clock driver for LS1028A Display output"
>> > + depends on ARCH_LAYERSCAPE || COMPILE_TEST
>> > + default ARCH_LAYERSCAPE
>> > + help
>> > + This driver support the Display output interfaces(LCD,
>> > +DPHY)
>> > pixel clocks
>> > + of the QorIQ Layerscape LS1028A, as implemented TSMC
>> > CLN28HPM PLL. Not all
>> > + features of the PLL are currently supported by the driver.
>> > By default,
>> > + configured bypass mode with this PLL.
>> > +
>> > config COMMON_CLK_XGENE
>> > bool "Clock driver for APM XGene SoC"
>> > default ARCH_XGENE
>> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/Makefile b/drivers/clk/Makefile index
>> > 0138fb14e6f8..97d1e5bc6de5 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/clk/Makefile
>> > +++ b/drivers/clk/Makefile
>> > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_NPCM7XX) +=
>> clk-npcm7xx.o
>> > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_NSPIRE) += clk-nspire.o
>> > obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_OXNAS) += clk-oxnas.o
>> > obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_PALMAS) += clk-palmas.o
>> > +obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_LS1028A_PLLDIG) += clk-plldig.o
>> > obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_PWM) += clk-pwm.o
>> > obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_QORIQ) += clk-qoriq.o
>> > obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_RK808) += clk-rk808.o
>> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-plldig.c b/drivers/clk/clk-plldig.c new
>> > file mode 100644 index 000000000000..f940a9d3d011
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-plldig.c
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,297 @@
>> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> > +/*
>> > + * Copyright 2019 NXP
>> > + *
>> > + * Clock driver for LS1028A Display output interfaces(LCD, DPHY).
>> > + */
>> > +
>> > +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>> > +#include <linux/device.h>
>> > +#include <linux/module.h>
>> > +#include <linux/err.h>
>> > +#include <linux/io.h>
>> > +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>> > +#include <linux/of.h>
>> > +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> > +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
>> > +
>> > +/* PLLDIG register offsets and bit masks */
>> > +#define PLLDIG_REG_PLLSR 0x24
>> > +#define PLLDIG_REG_PLLDV 0x28
>> > +#define PLLDIG_REG_PLLFM 0x2c
>> > +#define PLLDIG_REG_PLLFD 0x30
>> > +#define PLLDIG_REG_PLLCAL1 0x38
>> > +#define PLLDIG_REG_PLLCAL2 0x3c
>> > +#define PLLDIG_LOCK_MASK BIT(2)
>> > +#define PLLDIG_REG_FIELD_SSCGBYP BIT(30)
>> > +#define PLLDIG_REG_FIELD_FDEN BIT(30)
>> > +#define PLLDIG_REG_FIELD_DTHDIS GENMASK(17, 16)
>> > +#define PLLDIG_REG_FIELD_MULT GENMASK(7, 0)
>> > +#define PLLDIG_REG_FIELD_RFDPHI1 GENMASK(30, 25)
>> > +
>> > +/* Minimum output clock frequency, in Hz */ #define PHI1_MIN_FREQ
>> > +27000000
>> > +
>> > +/* Maximum output clock frequency, in Hz */ #define PHI1_MAX_FREQ
>> > +600000000
>> > +
>> > +/* Maximum of the divider */
>> > +#define MAX_RFDPHI1 63
>> > +
>> > +/*
>> > + * Clock configuration relationship between the PHI1
>> > frequency(fpll_phi) and
>> > + * the output frequency of the PLL is determined by the PLLDV,
>> > according to
>> > + * the following equation:
>> > + * fpll_phi = (pll_ref * mfd) / div_rfdphi1 */ struct
>> > +plldig_phi1_param {
>> > + unsigned long rate;
>> > + unsigned int rfdphi1;
>> > + unsigned int mfd;
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +static const struct clk_parent_data parent_data[] = {
>> > + {.index = 0},
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +struct clk_plldig {
>> > + struct clk_hw hw;
>> > + void __iomem *regs;
>> > + unsigned int mfd;
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +#define to_clk_plldig(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct clk_plldig, hw)
>> > +
>> > +static int plldig_enable(struct clk_hw *hw) {
>> > + struct clk_plldig *data = to_clk_plldig(hw);
>> > + u32 val;
>> > +
>> > + val = readl(data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLFM);
>> > + /*
>> > + * Use Bypass mode with PLL off by default, the frequency overshoot
>> > + * detector output was disable. SSCG Bypass mode should be enable.
>> > + */
>> > + val |= PLLDIG_REG_FIELD_SSCGBYP;
>> > + writel(val, data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLFM);
>> > +
>> > + val = readl(data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLFD);
>> > + /* Disable dither and Sigma delta modulation in bypass mode */
>> > + val |= FIELD_PREP(PLLDIG_REG_FIELD_FDEN, 0x1) |
>>
>> Unlike mentioned in the documentation, FDEN is "fractional divider
>> enable".
>>
>>
>
> Yes, this point just confirmed in yesterday.
>
>>
>> > + FIELD_PREP(PLLDIG_REG_FIELD_DTHDIS, 0x3);
>> > +
>> > + writel(val, data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLFD);
>> > +
>> > + return 0;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static void plldig_disable(struct clk_hw *hw) {
>> > + struct clk_plldig *data = to_clk_plldig(hw);
>> > + u32 val;
>> > +
>> > + val = readl(data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLFM);
>> > +
>> > + val &= ~PLLDIG_REG_FIELD_SSCGBYP;
>> > + val |= FIELD_PREP(PLLDIG_REG_FIELD_SSCGBYP, 0x0);
>> > +
>> > + writel(val, data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLFM); }
>> > +
>> > +static int plldig_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw) {
>> > + struct clk_plldig *data = to_clk_plldig(hw);
>> > +
>> > + return (readl(data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLFM) &
>> > + PLLDIG_REG_FIELD_SSCGBYP); }
>> > +
>> > +static unsigned long plldig_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>> > + unsigned long parent_rate) {
>> > + struct clk_plldig *data = to_clk_plldig(hw);
>> > + u32 mult, div, val;
>> > +
>> > + val = readl(data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLDV);
>> > +
>> > + /* Check if PLL is bypassed */
>> > + if (val & PLLDIG_REG_FIELD_SSCGBYP)
>> > + return parent_rate;
>> > +
>> > + /* Checkout multiplication factor divider value */
>> > + mult = FIELD_GET(PLLDIG_REG_FIELD_MULT, val);
>> > +
>> > + /* Checkout divider value of the output frequency */
>> > + div = FIELD_GET(PLLDIG_REG_FIELD_RFDPHI1, val);
>> > +
>> > + return (parent_rate * mult) / div; }
>> > +
>> > +static int plldig_calc_target_rate(unsigned long target_rate,
>> > + unsigned long parent_rate,
>> > + struct plldig_phi1_param *phi1) {
>> > + unsigned int div, ret;
>> > + unsigned long round_rate;
>> > +
>> > + /* Range limitation of the request target rate */
>> > + if (target_rate > PHI1_MAX_FREQ)
>> > + target_rate = PHI1_MAX_FREQ;
>> > + else if (target_rate < PHI1_MIN_FREQ)
>> > + target_rate = PHI1_MIN_FREQ;
>> > +
>> > + /*
>> > + * Firstly, check the request target rate whether is divisible
>> > + * by the best VCO frequency.
>> > + */
>> > + round_rate = parent_rate * phi1->mfd;
>> > + div = round_rate / target_rate;
>> Can't you use DIV_ROUND_UP(), DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL() or
>> DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL() and drop the stuff below except the range
>> check?
>>
>
> Great advice.
>
>>
>> > + if (!div || div > MAX_RFDPHI1)
>> > + return -EINVAL;
>> > +
>> > + ret = round_rate % target_rate;
>> > + if (ret) {
>> > + /*
>> > + * Rounded down the request target rate, VESA specifies
>> > + * 0.5% pixel clock tolerance, therefore this algorithm
>> > + * can able to compatible a lot of request rates within
>> > + * range of the tolerance.
>> > + */
>> > + round_rate += (target_rate / 2);
>> > + div = round_rate / target_rate;
>> > + if (!div || div > MAX_RFDPHI1)
>> > + return -EINVAL;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + phi1->rfdphi1 = div;
>> > + phi1->rate = target_rate;
>> > +
>> > + return 0;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static int plldig_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>> > + struct clk_rate_request *req) {
>> > + int ret;
>> > + unsigned long parent_rate;
>> > + struct clk_hw *parent;
>> > + struct plldig_phi1_param phi1_param;
>> > + struct clk_plldig *data = to_clk_plldig(hw);
>> > +
>> > + if (!req->rate)
>> > + return -ERANGE;
>> > +
>> > + phi1_param.mfd = data->mfd;
>> > + parent = clk_hw_get_parent(hw);
>> > + parent_rate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent);
>> > +
>> > + ret = plldig_calc_target_rate(req->rate, parent_rate, &phi1_param);
>> > + if (ret)
>> > + return ret;
>> > +
>> > + req->rate = phi1_param.rate;
>> > +
>> > + return 0;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static int plldig_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>> > + unsigned long parent_rate) {
>> > + struct clk_plldig *data = to_clk_plldig(hw);
>> > + struct plldig_phi1_param phi1_param;
>> > + unsigned int val, cond;
>> > + int ret;
>> > +
>> > + phi1_param.mfd = data->mfd;
>> > + ret = plldig_calc_target_rate(rate, parent_rate, &phi1_param);
>> > + if (ret)
>> > + return ret;
>> > +
>> > + val = readl(data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLDV);
>> > + val = FIELD_PREP(PLLDIG_REG_FIELD_MULT, phi1_param.mfd) |
>> > + FIELD_PREP(PLLDIG_REG_FIELD_RFDPHI1,
>> phi1_param.rfdphi1);
>> > +
>> > + writel(val, data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLDV);
>> > +
>> > + /* delay 200us make sure that old lock state is cleared */
>> > + udelay(200);
>> > +
>> > + /* Wait until PLL is locked or timeout (maximum 1000 usecs) */
>> > + return readl_poll_timeout_atomic(data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLSR,
>> cond,
>> > + cond & PLLDIG_LOCK_MASK, 0,
>> > + USEC_PER_MSEC); }
>> > +
>> > +static const struct clk_ops plldig_clk_ops = {
>> > + .enable = plldig_enable,
>> > + .disable = plldig_disable,
>> > + .is_enabled = plldig_is_enabled,
>> > + .recalc_rate = plldig_recalc_rate,
>> > + .determine_rate = plldig_determine_rate,
>> > + .set_rate = plldig_set_rate,
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +static int plldig_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
>> > + struct clk_plldig *data;
>> > + struct resource *mem;
>> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> > + int ret;
>> > +
>> > + data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
>> > + if (!data)
>> > + return -ENOMEM;
>> > +
>> > + mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> > + data->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, mem);
>> > + if (IS_ERR(data->regs))
>> > + return PTR_ERR(data->regs);
>> > +
>> > + /*
>> > + * Support to get the best loop multiplication divider value
>> > + * from DTS file, since this PLL can't changed this value on
>> > + * the fly, write the fixed value.
>> > + */
>> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "best-mfd", &data->mfd);
>> > + if (ret)
>> > + data->mfd = 0x2c;
>>
>> IMHO this is a really bad device tree binding. First it is not
>> described anywhere,
>> ie it is missing in the dt-bindings file and second, to actually make
>> use of the
>> "best-mfd" the user has to know the parent clock, the desired vco
>> frequency
>> and have to calculate it by himself.
>> IMHO a better one would be something like "vco-frequency". Also you
>> should
>> use the fractional divider to get better results. Using the fractional
>> divider
>> almost any VCO frequency is possible (within a certain range which
>> should be
>> checked [650 MHz to 1300 MHz]).
>>
>
> Yes, the fractional part can covered range is 27MHz, it can almost any
> VCO frequency.
> the fractional divider should be supported in this driver.
>
> I also knew the device tree binding is bad specially way, but here just
> want to
> provide a simple solution used to configure the MFD value for users
> requirement.
Well, but once it is in the device tree, it is hard to change, so there
should be no quick hacks, IMHO.
> So you think that should be use "vco-frequency" instead of the
> "best-mfd" in dts used to
> avoid user recalculate it(user may don’t know the parent rate)?
correct.
-michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists