linux-kernel - Re: net-next/master bisection: boot on beaglebone-black

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191122192718.GH6849@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 22 Nov 2019 19:27:18 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     guillaume.tucker@...labora.com, hulkci@...wei.com,
        tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com, khilman@...libre.com,
        mgalka@...labora.com, enric.balletbo@...labora.com,
        yuehaibing@...wei.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        hkallweit1@...il.com
Subject: Re: net-next/master bisection: boot on beaglebone-black

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 10:11:47AM -0800, David Miller wrote:

> If you're not combining the net and the net-next tree, as Stephen
> Rothwell's tree is doing, then you're going to run into this problem
> every single day and spam us with these messages.

> What is being done right now doesn't work.  You can't just wait for
> net integration into net-next, that doesn't cut it.

Is there a writeup somewhere of how your trees are expected to work?
That might help testing people figure things out, what you're doing is a
bit unusual and people working on testing infrastructure are likely not
going to be as engaged with the process for specific trees as developers
are.  I didn't spot anything in Docmentation/ and the wiki link in
MAINTAINERS seems broken but I might've been looking in the wrong places.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)