linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 26/91] pinctrl: xway: fix gpio-hog related boot issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191122060129.4239-25-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:00:24 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 26/91] pinctrl: xway: fix gpio-hog related boot issues

From: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>

[ Upstream commit 9b4924da4711674e62d97d4f5360446cc78337af ]

This patch is based on commit a86caa9ba5d7 ("pinctrl: msm: fix gpio-hog
related boot issues").

It fixes the issue that the gpio ranges needs to be defined before
gpiochip_add().

Therefore, we also have to swap the order of registering the pinctrl
driver and registering the gpio chip.

You also have to add the "gpio-ranges" property to the pinctrl device
node to get it finally working.

Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
Acked-by: John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-xway.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-xway.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-xway.c
index dd85ad1807f52..8ea1c6e2a6b2b 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-xway.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-xway.c
@@ -1748,14 +1748,6 @@ static int pinmux_xway_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 	xway_pctrl_desc.pins = xway_info.pads;
 
-	/* register the gpio chip */
-	xway_chip.parent = &pdev->dev;
-	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &xway_chip, NULL);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register gpio chip\n");
-		return ret;
-	}
-
 	/* setup the data needed by pinctrl */
 	xway_pctrl_desc.name	= dev_name(&pdev->dev);
 	xway_pctrl_desc.npins	= xway_chip.ngpio;
@@ -1777,10 +1769,33 @@ static int pinmux_xway_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	/* finish with registering the gpio range in pinctrl */
-	xway_gpio_range.npins = xway_chip.ngpio;
-	xway_gpio_range.base = xway_chip.base;
-	pinctrl_add_gpio_range(xway_info.pctrl, &xway_gpio_range);
+	/* register the gpio chip */
+	xway_chip.parent = &pdev->dev;
+	xway_chip.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+	xway_chip.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &xway_chip, NULL);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register gpio chip\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * For DeviceTree-supported systems, the gpio core checks the
+	 * pinctrl's device node for the "gpio-ranges" property.
+	 * If it is present, it takes care of adding the pin ranges
+	 * for the driver. In this case the driver can skip ahead.
+	 *
+	 * In order to remain compatible with older, existing DeviceTree
+	 * files which don't set the "gpio-ranges" property or systems that
+	 * utilize ACPI the driver has to call gpiochip_add_pin_range().
+	 */
+	if (!of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "gpio-ranges")) {
+		/* finish with registering the gpio range in pinctrl */
+		xway_gpio_range.npins = xway_chip.ngpio;
+		xway_gpio_range.base = xway_chip.base;
+		pinctrl_add_gpio_range(xway_info.pctrl, &xway_gpio_range);
+	}
+
 	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Init done\n");
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.20.1